Sprayable Tundish Lining
Because of some of the above difficulties there was already a push towards automation of the tundish lining system. Meanwhile, advances in machine design and chemical formulation technology in advanced countries led to the development of a “Spray” system, in which a thick slurry could be transported after thorough mixing, and finally deposited onto the tundish after “atomizing” with compressed air. The first robotic application system was commissioned in 1982 which from the later half of the 1980’s started to be widely used in developed countries due to the significant benefits of lower placed density and better control of the lining thickness than gunned linings.
The sprayable tundish lining refractories are mainly MgO and SiO2. The MgO content is usually in the range of 70% to 90% with balance percentage of SiO2. For longer duration of sequence casting higher amount of MgO along with higher thickness of the refractory lining is needed. It was no longer required to transfer the dry powder after fluidization (as required in gunning). This enabled the addition of fibers and other chemicals to the mass and homogeneous mixing and deposition became a reality. The lining could be preheated and the cast taken in a “hot start” fashion, or allowed to cool to room temperature and taken as a “cold start” tundish. While curing, it needs to be controlled to ensure lining integrity and this demands that the tundish permanent lining is ideally below 100 degrees C for satisfactory placement. Wet processes such as sprayable lining with up to 30% water addition by weight and the presence of hoses and spills may create OH and S issues in the steel plant. Even then this spray lining system was able to successfully combine many of the advantages of board and gunning, while eliminating the disadvantages like - joints, sand backing, rebound losses, dust problems, poor insulation etc.
Advantages of Sprayable Tundish Lining
(a) Low risk of H picking, (b) No joints, (c) No sand, (d) Low inventory, (e) Less labour intensive, (f) Easy deskull, (g) Good insulation, (h) “Cold Start” also possible, (i) Controllable lining thickness, (j) Robotic application for big size tundish (involve large investment)
Disadvantages of Sprayable Tundish Lining
(a) Investment in equipments, (b) Intensive curing required, (c) Moderate washout risk, (d) Relatively longer T/D cycle (than boards).
There is a host of different tundish lining refractories which can be categorized into 5 major types (also in a roughly chronological order):
1. Brick Lining
2. Gunnable Tundish Lining
3. Tundish Board Lining
4. Sprayable Tundish Lining
5. Tundish Dry Lining (in-situ formed)
Continuous casting has been a landmark achievement in the area of steel making. Continuous casting refractories directly control the molten steel in the last stage of liquid steel processing and these are therefore, required to have high stability and special properties. In any continuous casting shop, tundish acts as a buffer vessel between steel ladle and mould. It serves the purpose of reservoir as well as fulfills certain metallurgical functions like floatation of inclusion, control of flow to the moulds, thermal and chemical homogenization etc. Small wonder that over the years, there have been a continuous change in the practices of refractory lining of tundish around the world.
From a mere reservoir and distribution vessel, the tundish started to be viewed as a steel refining vessel and a totally new field in the process of steel making technology emerged known as Tundish Technology. In this article we have briefly mentioned about the developments and practices of tundish lining refractories in their chronological order and also the main features, merits and demerits of different types of refractories used in tundish lining to enable an individual steel maker decide what could be the best for his plant.
Tundish Dry Lining
Dry tundish linings were introduced in Europe probably in 1986. The system differ from all previous processes in the sense that it is applied in a dry powder form and do not require the addition of water to form the tundish working lining. Generally it utilizes a resinous bond (Binder / Catalyst reaction) which is activated by relatively low amounts of heat (around 160 degree C). Vibration may or may not be required, depending upon the product being used, but it is essential to use a former and the dry powder is fed in the gap between the tundish permanent lining and the former. The hot air is introduced at approximately 400 degree C and the heating cycle takes around 45 minutes with further 30minutes for cooling. Thus a lot time can be saved while on the negative side; the dry system still has lower insulation (due to higher density) and is dependant on crainage in the tundish bay for installation. But one major advantage of dry lining is that because of the absence of water in this system there is no direct adhesion to the permanent tundish lining which ensures good deskulling and prolongs life of tundish lining. Besides, the smooth finish on a dry tundish lining and ability to consistently reproduce lining geometry offers improvements in steel quality and better erosion resistance resulting in the potential to increase sequence lengths.
Advantages of Dry Tundish Lining
(a) No joints, (b) No sand, (c) Low H risk (when hot), (c) Low inventory, (d) Less labour intensive, (e) Reduced tundish preparing time, (f) Low washout risk, (g) Easy deskull, (h) Uniform liner clean environment friendly application, (h) High sequence possible, (i) OH and S benefits, (j) Easy, quick installation, (k) Improved steel cleanliness because of lining integrity
Disadvantages of Dry Tundish Lining
(a) Investment in equipments, (b) H risk (when cold), (c) Lower insulation, (d) Crainage dependence.
Sequence ‘Continuous Casting’ is increasing and creating a demand for higher performance of refractories. Refractories for continuous casting that are exposed to molten steel, are not only subject to heavy corrosion and abrasion by molten steel, but also have a large effect on quality of the steel and the yield points. So, while there are advantages even in bricked and gunning systems, the disadvantages outweigh the merits. Similarly although there are some demerits in all the systems of board, spray or dry lining, the advantages seem to be more in these systems. Making a choice appears to be difficult amongst the three systems with merits and demerits being almost equally balanced. Therefore, recourse must be taken of other factors like those of steel plant operations, quality of steel, etc when trying to decide between board, spray and dry linings.
Tundish Board Lining
The mid 1970’s saw the introduction of a new type of tundish wear lining; which were board systems comprising low density, highly insulating, disposable, pre-formed, and pre-cured refractory boards. Easy deskull, no equipment investment and the low cost of silica variety also contributed to its run-away popularity among many steel makers. FOSECO’s GARNEX became a household name in Indian continuous casting circles during this time. Initially silica based boards were used which allowed only “cold start” practice. Magnesite based boards were introduced in mid 1980’s to fulfill the requirement of pre-heatability, i.e., a “hot start” practice for low hydrogen considerations in the manufacture of high alloy quality steels. However, the labour intensiveness, presence of joints and sand backing, and breakages etc remained as inherent handicaps of board system.
Advantages of Tundish Board Lining
(a) Low risk of H picking (when hot), (b) Uniform liner shape, (c) No need to cure, (d) Good insulation, (e) Cold start possible, (f) Easy deskull, (g) Low energy requirement, (h) Short T/D cycle, (i) No investment in equipments, (j) Low washout risk, (k) Low cost (silica-based board)
Disadvantages of Tundish Board Lining
(a) Joints, (b) Sand backing, (c) Hydrogen picking risk (when cold), (d) Labour intensive, (e) High inventory, (f) Handling/breakage problem, (g) High cost (magnesite-based boards)
In response to increasing trends for making cleaner steel and also with the advent of Continuous Casting technology a variety of refractories for tundish lining have into the market. However, board system is still popular in countries where labour costs are low and application technologies are not readily available. Tundish board, in particular, developed for energy-saving are finding wide acceptance.
With the first commercial introduction of continuous casting in around 1960’s initially the same concept of refractory brick lining technology as used in other metal containing vessels was applied to continuous casting tundish lining. Tundish bricked lining refractories were of high alumina type used in direct contact with liquid steel, after pre-heating. It was essentially an extension of ladle refractory practices to the tundish and continuous casting.
Advantages of Tundish Brick Lining
(a) Low risk of H picking by molten steel, (b) No sand, (c) Low inventory, (d) No investment in equipments, & (e) Low washout risk.
Disadvantages of Tundish Brick Lining
(a) Intensive curing required, (b) Highly labour intensive, (c) Poor insulation, (d) Late stage temperature drop in casting operations due to high thermal conductivity of the brick lining resulting into metal heat loss affecting the metallurgical parameters, (e) “Cold Start” not possible, (f) Large tundish fleet required, (g) Difficult deskulling (stripping), (h) Joints, (i) Long tundish preparation time
Too many difficulties led some people to opt for a trowellable, and subsequently gunnable, over-lining at some added costs.
Gunnable Tundish Lining
Gunnable refractory lining in tundish is said to have commercially started in Japan to overcome some of the problems of bricked linings. Initially such tundish lining refractories were alumino-silicate based and later converted to magnesite based or basic type to assist with metallurgical practice. In this method the dry refractory powder of the right composition after fluidization is transferred and installed on the tundish wall by using a gunning machine to obtain a monolithic lining. Though it provided a monolithic joint-free structure and relatively improved deskulling but little was gained in the way of preheat times or heat losses due to the relatively high density of the gunned linings. There was still a tendency for the linings to crack and spall during rapid preheat and this also precluded the use of gunnable refractory lining for cold start practices.
Advantages of Gunnable Tundish Lining
(a) Low risk of H picking by molten steel, (b) No sand, (c) Low inventory, (d) No joints, (e) Less labour intensive, (f) Relatively easy installation in lesser time, (g) Relatively less difficult to deskull.
Disadvantages of Gunnable Tundish Lining
(a) Intensive curing required, (b) High wastage because of rebound losses, (c) Poor insulation, (d) “Cold Start” not possible, (e) High washout risk, (f) Low thermal stability, (g) High shrinkage causes high stress, subsequent crack formations during operation whereas a low shrinkage can be a barrier for easy deskulling, (h) Dust problems, (i) Energy intensive, (j) Long T/D cycle, (k) High costs (l) Investment in equipment.